Each we see now and then regulators try the stupidest move to the Internet: the encryption ban, demanding it, prohibiting it. They seem to try random things, and lots of it can be explained with the regulators not be permitted to allow the Internet come into being in the first place.
The regulators remain totally confused when it comes to the Internet - all for what it is (they agree on a communication network with only terminal) through which responsible (person, it is an agreement between organic millions more like a language) whether human rights should apply as usual during use (yes, very yes).
Much of this confusion can be traced to the fact that regulators are not involved in the creation of the Internet. They never agreed to create something, then they do not know what the prior consent of their can be reversed, extended or varied. The Internet itself is the first example of large-scale permissionless innovation
The classic model to create something new basically goes like this :. The three groups of inventors, investors and regulators get together and decide to allow something new temporarily try. If it works, the permit is made permanent. For an example, see how the drone delivery and self-driving cars are given temporary permits in some limited areas at the moment: that is how practically all used to be developed
The idea that the. Internet is not need labor regulations is quite confusing for regulators. The notion that nothing to regulating Internet needs to work even Internet services supplanting analog services that are closely regulated, is not only confusing, but almost aggravating.
In addition, these are analog regulators which we speak. Excluding infants. People who receive their printed e-mails to them by their secretary and believe them understand what the Internet is about (and I wish I was one, but I'm not).
Perhaps the best part is that the Internet not only works very well without regulation, the Internet as a body will also completely ignore any regulation that does not please him. Not only not necessary regulations, it is also completely ineffective, if not ignored.
While mostly positive, that's why privacy remains your own responsibility.
0 Komentar