Dismissing privacy, many people use the idea that since they have done nothing wrong, they have "nothing to hide". It ignores the most fundamental fact: it is not the that determine whether they did something wrong, but most likely it will be the fascist powers increase. 86 of 766 elected members of Parliament belonging to the fascist factions, and these might actually be the ones to take control of mass surveillance.
There has recently been a european election that should give pause to people who say they have "nothing to hide", that they "do not mind the surveillance." Deployment ongoing mass surveillance at the moment means that you can not hold a single private conversation, can not walk anywhere unnoticed, and can not find any information without it being logged. All that registered to use against you later.
Some people have argued that this can not possibly be used against them because they are good, they have done nothing wrong. And saying this, they are the most dangerous event of all: it is themselves coming whether their conversations, feelings and thoughts are incomplete source of government concern. It's not. It is whoever is in power at the time that determines that.
There is an economic crisis sweeping the world in the US, Europe and China. This coupled with politicians ivory tower who are disconnected from the everyday concerns of the people, have always been a recipe for a rise of extremist parties that promise the order by striking down on minority groups in society - anything people coming to be born to love people of their own sex for people born with little wrong shade of skin or lineage.
86 of 766 elected to Parliament were gone fascist or similar extremists. Seven elected were openly Nazi. These are the people who will listen to all your conversations, view all your connections, read all your thoughts, and to determine if they think you have done something wrong.
86 of 766 may seem insignificant (11.2%). However, they are not evenly distributed among European states. In Denmark, the Dansk Folkeparti was the largest party with 27% of votes. In France, the worse National Front was the largest party with 25% of votes. Whoops. I guess he wants to be Danish and French so you should never get mass surveillance in place. Ohwait, they already have that
In addition, the size of a political force -. Over 10% - means that more or less all the others will move in their direction to prevent bleeding more votes for
.Just how hostile is a party like National Front ? To provide context, its founder said recently that "Immigration is nothing that Mr. Ebola can solve in three months," suggesting a mass execution of minorities is a perfectly reasonable and compelling solution to the problems of society. This was just voted on the largest party in France. Are you really, really comfortable with this kind of government to determine whether your conversations, thoughts, habits dating and information retrieval are of concern - in their eyes, not yours
This brings us to the crucial lessons for civil liberties:
rule No. 1 for the mass surveillance is that it will happily used by the next regime in power, you can not predict today. If you can not give your worst enemy, do not allow it at all.
rule # 2 for the mass surveillance is that it is not you who will determine if you have something to hide.
monitoring gives no security. He never did. Imagine the mass surveillance on the rise on the same time downright fascist political parties - which could may horribly, horribly wrong here
Privacy remains your own responsibility
[1945013?]
0 Komentar