The n 'yet there are people wonder why we need privacy in the first place, seeing it as a kind of superficial luxury of the first world at the individual level. But privacy is not an individual privilege, it is a fundamental collective right, and for good reason :. Without privacy, other checks and balances in society disintegrates
As the full scale of loose oversight mandate unravels, some people wonder why we need privacy anyway . It's a good question, which must have a good answer. Fortunately, he has.
Most people tend to see privacy as an individual luxury rather than a collective interest. But it goes well beyond being a special luxury or a personal privilege: it is fundamental to the concept of democracy
Let's look at the concept of consent of the governed for a minute. . It is essentially the opposite of taxation without representation , which caused the British colonies to revolt once and formed the United States of America. What this means is that you agree - in one form or - setting style rules the government for your daily life, and the people that the government
The consent of the governed can take several forms .. one of the most common public elections would be free and fair. This assumes, of course, that people have the right to consent or dissent freely
"Only 52 people have failed in the elections by giving the correct answer on the ballot." -. Help -President in the game Tropico 5
Have you noticed that "the consent or dissent freely" part? Guess that makes surveillance?
The people involved in real-time monitoring today described it as "basically be able to see the form thoughts in real time in the people followed." It used to be that only the monitoring of conversations monitored, the exchange ideas. With monitoring the Internet, and so research, information searches, cross-references, and drafts, governments are now able to monitor training ideas - good before they are communicated, if they ever are.
I can not stress what a game-changer it is. It allows governments to keep them responsible citizens of dissent - in fact, even considering dissent, without communicating to person
He did not need the accountability of the strength.; much more subtle mechanisms are available. You can lose this promotion in the public sector. Never get this working for the government. Or have your lease terminated on public housing. Again, even what is visible: the worst would be a suspicion that something like this could happen. Ghosts in the mind; invisible fears. Once they have grasped - and they do! - Can consent of the governed is a fantasy, an illusion
This is why it can not be monitored at idea-training ;. at the Internet we have today. If there is no consent of the governed - it can not be. And by extension, there is no democracy, and therefore a society that will end most likely in a rather unpleasant upheaval.
Privacy remains your own responsibility.
0 Komentar