privacy is not there for the purpose of protecting people who want to do harm. Privacy is a civil right to chance: it is guaranteed in a democratic society, a crucial safety valve against unjust laws that should not be able to be applied. As such, it is not an individual benefit as much as it is a collective :. A mechanism that benefits everyone, even those who do not use
Most people understand vaccinations. We protect ourselves against infection with the preparation of our immune system against pathogens (viruses, bacteria) by showing the disabled versions of this pathogen to the immune system, so that the immune system recognizes and is prepared when and if an attack Live happens to this pathogen.
But the importance does not stop there, at the individual level. Immunization is not only an individual benefit, it is collective advantage. If vaccines are in place in a population, they even benefit those who - for whatever reason - were not vaccinated. If a pathogen is unable to take control in a population, because more are vaccinated, contagion will never break, which benefits everyone.
Therefore, vaccination is not an individual benefit (something that is only those who have been vaccinated), but collective profit -. everyone enjoys it
Life works the same way. It was never "only for those who had something to hide."
The laws are changed as a result of a change in behavior and evolution of acceptances in the general population, and very rarely the other way. (The debate on cannabis legalization and being late is an example of this, as well as marriage equality.) This means that the laws are changed because of the people who break the law to one of the many reasons - they might see it as unjust, illegitimate, step with public acceptance, or break the law simply because they want to. The reason does not really matter
To put a clear example :. If people who are born homosexuals had not insisted on being who they were, although it is illegal, laws would not have changed to make it legal. Do the legal. This need for privacy, and he did not have just a single benefit for some offenders -. It was the collective benefit of the repeal of unjust laws, something that could not take place without privacy
There are many examples of this kind, and is one of the main reasons we we need privacy. A nation that can apply all its laws, devoid of any privacy at all, stop dead in its tracks since the values are no longer allowed to change and evolve. Most people today who look at what our values were 50 years ago are horrified; is there a reason to believe that people 50 years on not think the same today? And yet, people justify violations of privacy to "round up criminals."
If we had monitoring now in place it was 50 years ago, homosexuality would be even criminal. as marriages between people of different skin tones. It was only because of privacy that these laws could be questioned, debated and changed. If "round up criminals" was not acceptable as an excuse so why should it be now?
We need privacy. Not for individuals break the law, not for people who have something to hide, but for the collective benefit of a few people may question the norms and standards that perhaps are simply false, which benefits all .
We need privacy to evolve as a company.
In the absence of government providing privacy, it remains your responsibility.
0 Komentar