Two recent events shed light on the full absurdity of the claim that sensitive data collected by the monitoring is "safe" in any way, shape or form.
The first is a couple years old, and this is Edward Snowden publishing dirtiest conceivable machine of the National Security Agency, arguably the most secret agency and protection the most powerful nuclear military nation on the planet.
The second is China piracy in the United States' Department of Homeland Security and staff of downloading files on everyone working with national security in the US - issues that specifically included the weak points could be used to pressure or extortion against these people, all the thousands of them. (To be fair, China has been assumed to be the penetrator, but no direct evidence has been presented. It does not matter to this particular point.)
The United States spends more to national security than the next 25 countries combined
delivery here is as simple as it is quotable :.
When the most powerful country can not protect its very dirty laundry, which makes anyone think that the private random surveillance data collected on an ordinary citizen will be protected in the slightest?
Privacy remains your own responsibility.
0 Komentar