politicians in several countries have proposed restrictions on privacy and freedom in the form of increased surveillance powers after the terrorist attacks in Paris. This is not only false and harmful, but misleading because they know or should know such monitoring is useless against terrorism -. so they something else in mind
politicians of all colors seem to say now that "we need to protect against terrorism, and therefore we need for more electronic surveillance. "That would have been the highest form of rubbish, if it has not been a real erosion of very real freedoms. All these politicians should know much better, and there are reasons believe many of them not know better and act in deception.
In 02, there was a military exercise conducted by the Pentagon that the cost of about $ 250 million, involving more than 13,500 people. It has become a total joke, because of the way the US has refused to learn something from him and backscripted the whole thing to avoid the embarrassment of the public
The mock US invasion of an Arab country -. Perhaps Iraq, possibly Iran, the country was unnamed in the year - had two players: Blue force, which was in the United States, and the Red force, which was the country low-tech simulated invaded
Red strength to whip the American forces return. the Stone Age in this simulated exercise. The United States does not stand a chance. The leader of the Red Force made with the simplest means necessary: instead of using the wiretappable radio communications, they used motorcycle couriers to coordinate and relay orders. They used light signals instead of radio signals to communicate with aircraft. By just escape the monitoring network, which was trivial, the Red Force responded to a simulated war ultimatum effectively eliminating the US naval force (including an aircraft carrier, ten cruisers, and 85% of the craft of landing). The exercise arbitrators have decided that this "is not how the exercise was supposed to happen," resurrected all the dead seacraft and prohibits the player from the Red Force to communicate in a way that has not wiretappable and ordered to reveal its positions and forces. the rest of the year was therefore a carefully scripted joke in how to avoid the embarrassment Pentagonian.
It bears repeating that this was . a United States of year therefore, the Pentagon and Western politicians are very conscious that the wiretap is worse than useless against a low-tech adversary - you start count on it and think it offers total visibility, and so are dumbstruck then unconsciously blind and water blown (which was actually the case in this simulation exercise). this is a known fact as illustrated by this exercise in 02.
There is simply no substitute for the work of the classic police. Thinking that the split of the fiber can replace traditional detective work is not only stupid, it is downright dangerous than the assumption is completely false.
pigeons namely Osama bin Laden used homing to communicate. He was eventually traced by his Courier , a classic work of detective. Not by any type of electronic surveillance coverage.
Since the terrorist attacks in Paris, David Cameron of the United Kingdom proposed enhanced powers to wiretap, Anna Kinberg Batra as Sweden. Both are quite misleading in any suggestion that monitoring helps to overcome all forms of terrorism. There are others, many others.
The only thing overall monitoring helps defeat is an open society, we must protect.
0 Komentar